Censored Beyond Words

By Roger Stone

How Twitter Transformed Itself from a Frivolous Online Message Board into the Leading Digital Innovator of 21st Century Techno-Fascism, Turbocharging Censorship from the Mere Deletion of Words Into Erasing Human Beings Entirely

“The liberties of our Country, the freedom of our civil constitution are worth defending at all hazards: And it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair Inheritance from our worthy Ancestors: They purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood; and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle; or be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men.”    Samuel Adams, October 14, 1771

I always liked Twitter. It was lively, snarky and always challenging to get your bon mot into 140 characters. My feed was not for the faint-hearted. It was pungent, pugnacious and sometimes risqué. It was certainly nothing close to the over-the-top hordes of haters on Twitter who have threatened to kill me, my wife, my kids and even my dogs. But then Twitter doesn’t seem to care about this, nor has it acted to ban them, as it has attempted to do to me. The imbecile Keith Olbermann drops the F-bomb on President Trump, and even his family, almost daily but Twitter looks the other way. Twitter, it seems, holds me to a different standard, if there is any standard at all.

It is worth pointing out that only by the grace of the Lord God Almighty were Twitter’s murky star chamber of sneaky, faceless censors, and the craven, disingenuous corporate autocrats behind them, not around when the likes of Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams and many more brave rebels chose to publicly revolt against constant royal subjugation.

Given how boldly those men defied convention and correctness, rejecting sanitized platitudes in favor of incendiary, seditious, do-or-die rhetoric, it is a safe bet they would have been quickly and summarily silenced, suspended in secret by Twitter’s selective political minders and disappeared without a trace, had they found themselves at the mercy of the Twitter content police.

Harsh, insulting, profane, indelicate, over-the-top and even outright nasty public rhetoric in the heat of partisan combat is an inherent and arguably-healthy feature of our centuries-old American political tradition.

In other words, Americans engage with our political opponents, no matter how ugly it might get. We have traditionally eschewed any resort to disingenuous offence-taking or phony outrage or any other species of whining victimhood as a proxy for cheap point-scoring or advantage-taking over opponents.

What Americans do not do is try to censor or silence our opponents merely for not agreeing with our own ideology, or for not conforming with some arbitrary restriction someone might try to put on our rhetoric to pre-empt full-throated engagement of opponents.

No segment of the American political spectrum has been better acquainted with, and more prolific in, the use of mockery, profanity, contempt and, yes, hatred as the preferred means to go after opponents than the American political left.

One need not look past the instant stream of non-stop hatred, abuse and defamation that has been spewed about me, and to me, in the reply comments of nearly every Tweet I ever posted in the last two years, to see how true this is.

It is also true, and certainly curious, that none of this endless torrent of hatred and invective towards me has ever resulted in any action by Twitter against the cyber-lynch mobsters who would viciously assault me on a daily basis.  It would seem that if one is a good little leftist and attacks the right people (or wrong people, as the case may) then no assault is too nasty to overlook.

Totalitarian Corporate Thought Police

It is perplexing, to say the least, how it is that Twitter treats certain public figures on their platform as though they are delicate snowflakes in need of Twitter’s special vigilante protection from big bad meanies like me.

Yet, I am treated by Twitter like a human punching bag with a target painted on it, with open season for any sort of attack to be launched against me, no matter how repugnant or hate-filled it is on the face of it, without need to stretch one’s imagination to suss a “micro-aggression.”

If passive inaction towards its fellow travelers on the screeching nasty radical left who constantly spew hatred my way is any indication of Twitter’s “standards” for policing offensive words toward public figures like myself, then it is absolutely within the realm of acceptability to take salty pot shots at nationally-known network “news” personalities who not only choose to be public figures but are also handsomely paid for it.

If one considers the overarching fact that these “news” personalities deceitfully masquerade as reporters or journalists, of some sort, while effectively acting every bit the partisan propagandists one would expect to find as low-level hired campaign hacks, then the notion that I must be turned into a non-person to protect them from my salty expressions of contempt is beyond laughable, totally bizarre, and extreme to the point that there is simply no valid explanation for it other than the barely-disguised partisan animus of the creeps behind Twitter’s star chamber and its erasures of inconvenient human beings from this public platform they seem intent to control with an iron fist.

Aside from the inherently extreme and patently discriminatory nature of my being instantly turned into a non-person by Twitter over mere insults that contained no threats, or really anything of any consequence at all, except perhaps to the delicate feelings of the partisan media hitmen to whom they were directed, the attempt to justify this cyber beheading by resort to “Twitter’s Rules” is too cynical and disingenuous to stomach.

Only the sneakiest and most craven of corporate fascist bullies would actually hide behind a bunch of vague, if not totally-undefined, “rules” that they alone can summarily change in any way at any time…that they alone impose whenever they want for whatever reasons they want, selectively, yet arbitrarily, without warning, hearing, or even explanation.

The plain truth is that anyone who doesn’t immediately recognize that totalitarian leftist orthodoxy is what is really at play here, maniacally intent on suppressing undesirables and their “hate” speech, is paying absolutely ZERO attention.

Regardless of who or what is involved, on any level, Twitter’s thought police are never going to qualify as some sort of high, holy tribune of rule enforcement and the maintenance of supposed “standards”.

They are clearly discriminatory, dishonest partisans who saw their chance to drive a truck through an insulting, but effectively harmless, few Tweets to run it right over me in a calculated partisan takedown.

The Twitterati, however, will soon find the runaway truckload of bullshit they ran me over with headed straight for them…..with pedal to the metal.

  • Daisy Eloise Applewhite

    There have been some (no, a lot) of Roger Stone’s tweets that I have found offensive. On the other hand, many of his tweets have been funny or simply innocuous. I find it alarming that Twitter has suspended Stone’s account. Twitter’s policy is inconsistent at best. If one wants to see this as a First Amendment issue, the right to speak one’s mind is a Constitutional right. However, the amendment comes with the understood caveat that one should not yell “FIRE”! in a crowded theater. (Unless, of course the theater really IS on fire.) Were Mr. Stone’s tweets the equivalent of yelling FIRE in a crowded theater? This can also be seen as a form of discrimination. A clear argument can be made that Twitter suspended Stone because of their collective personal opinion and Twitter’s capricious policy on what is acceptable speech. Neither of these reasons/excuses can hold up against the First Amendment.

  • Lance Cordill

    Why does anyone waste their time with the sewer of the Internet, Twitter?

  • DJTWILLWIN

    Twitter needs to be regulated as a utility obviously they no longer respect our constitution.
    They allow hate groups but not right wing groups.

  • Vladimir Pepe

    I hear that ISIS is allowed to create accounts and communicate via Twitter (as well as YouTube). If true, then the owners of Twitter (and YouTube) should be prosecuted for gross negligence.

  • Heart and Soul

    Fascism is using technology to oppress citizens!
    Internet/Tech Feudalism is showing the true colour of globalism!

  • John Buatti

    This is the Deep State next move to try to connect Trump with Russia collusion..
    How is Trump supposed to know what his secretary invested his money in ?
    Do you know what he had for breakfast ?
    Everyone is responsible for their own tax dealings ..so how is this Trump’s responsibility?
    And how does this make an Election win any less of a win or collusion with Russia? We are talking tax here not election votes !
    Are they saying that the Democrats have had no business dealings with Russia before and during the Russian sanctions ?
    Any business dealings with Russia before the Russian sanctions can’t be considered illegal so you have no proof of wrongdoing by any in the Trump’s team !
    Once again they use someone else tax dealing that worked for the Trump’s Election to delegitimatize and tarnish Trump Election win !
    You lost the election ..get over it !
    https://www.icij.org/investigations/paradise-papers/paradise-papers-exposes-donald-trump-russia-links-and-piggy-banks-of-the-wealthiest-1-percent/

  • John Buatti
  • Dank
  • Clarissa Danae

    When you take on Twitter, please tell the court how often people make Death Threats on our President with no repercussions on their accounts by Twitter and their Failure to report these to authorities.