JFK FOES UNITE FOR RECORD DUMP

By Roger Stone

Roger Stone and Gerald Posner, two New York Times bestselling authors who are polar opposites about who killed JFK, join in urging Donald Trump to release all the remaining classified files on Kennedy’s assassination.

About 3,100 files are still sealed in the National Archives. Under the 1992 JFK Records Act, the Archives have until October 26 to decide which of those files to publicly disclose.

Some of the classified documents include a CIA personality study of Oswald, top-secret testimony of former CIA officers to congressional committees, transcripts of interrogations with Soviet defector and Oswald handler Yuri Nosenko, letters about the case from J. Edgar Hoover and Jackie Kennedy, the CIA file on Jack Wasserman, the attorney for New Orleans mob boss Carlos Marcello, and the operational file of E. Howard Hunt, career spy and Watergate burglar.

Roger Stone, in his bestselling 2013 The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ, set forth the case that LBJ was the mastermind of a plot that included the CIA, the Mob and Big Texas Oil to kill Kennedy.

Gerald Posner, in his 1993 bestselling finalist for the Pulitzer for History, Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK concluded that the Warren Commission conclusions are correct and Oswald acting alone had killed Kennedy.

While they might not agree on who killed Kennedy, Stone and Posner are longstanding advocates for the release of all the government files on the assassination.

“These files should have been released long ago,” says Posner. “The government does this all the time, over classified documents and then holds on to them for decades under the guise of ‘national security.’ All the secrecy just feeds people’s suspicions that the government has something to hide and adds fuel to conspiracy theories.” Posner is convinced the case will still be closed when the last document is made public.

”I know CIA Director Pompeo is urging the President to delay the release of these records for another 25 years, said Stone. “They must reflect badly on the CIA even though virtually everyone involved is long dead ” Stone believes the evidence supporting the case in his book is still hidden somewhere in government files.

Both authors called on President Trump – who is empowered to make the final decision should the National Archives or CIA balk on releasing all the files – to opt for transparency.

Contact [email protected]

  • john martin

    Can ‘t the National Archives be taken to court in an effort to let the public know what happened to JFK?

    • ROZ

      That’s a great point. A lawsuit filed against the National Archives may be the key to the release of the files. It’s way past time for the American people to know the entire truth about who killed our 35th president. I am in total agreement with both sides concerning the release of files on the assassination of JFK. As for the history of that event, I read Stone’s book and I believe he has the most thorough and truthful account of the assassination.

      • Botvinnik

        I concur.

        • R Greg Leaver

          I haven’t read Stone’s book so not sure if he discusses the real man behind the curtain. It is more probable, in my view, that it was LBJ’s political machine that ordered the JFK hit, rather than LBJ himself. And that political machine has a name at the pointy end of the spear: HAROLD HUNT. He and his Texas Oil Men cronies were the ones that wanted to put LBJ on the throne. The Bobby Baker scandal elevated that WANT to a NEED. Hunt’s tentacles reached deep into the CIA, and certain members of the Corporate Interests of America were obliged to take on the Black Ops hit, leveraging Mob assets in the process.

    • dennisneal

      Trump will not release all the JFK documents. I wish he would. On October 26, 2017 we will find out.

  • John Buatti

    How do you get trough the front door of Las Vegas building top floors with a machine gun and tripod in your hands ?
    Wasn’t security or police checking people given the latest terror attacks ?
    The blood is on the security’s and police hands and not on the gun lobby…the gunman could have had a hand grenades with him and kill just as many …so are you going to then blame the ammunition industry ?

  • John Buatti

    The US Deep state wants to disarm the US people to then impose their militarized police on them with this staged execution in Las Vegas..!

  • John Buatti

    How do you get trough the front door of Las Vegas building and to the room on the 32nd floor with 23 firearms machine guns and tripod with over 500 rounds of ammunition in your hands given that there were more then 500 people injured ?
    How did he manage to shoot all 23 guns at once? Why bring 23 guns when you can only shoot one at the time having only two hands ?
    Was someone helping him shoot these 500+ people or is it possible to shoot 500+ people on your own ?
    I’ve heard the sound of the shooting and it sounds to me like 2 guns shooting at the same time , one continuously and one with a different pitch intermittently .

    • Borders protect Constitution

      Having 23 guns in the hotel room is the biggest red flag something isn’t as it should be. You might bring a few extra in case their was a jam, but it doesn’t make sense to bring that many for a mass shooting. It would make sense to bring more ammo, not more guns. Either these guns were put there so the gun grabbers could take nice pictures showing how “gun collectors” are evil, or he was an arms dealer and showing them to a customer, and the deal was a setup.

      • Duane Farmer

        Me think you just hit the nail on the head with that last point.

  • John Buatti

    Well the Globalist’s Social Engineers have done more engineering on our history and language ,
    they are re-engineering society that we know today by removing our identity and replacing it with a new version and they use the excuse that it might offend minorities or non religious people to implement it!
    Well History is just that and can’t be changed to just appease a minority….and where is the proof that these minorities are “offended” …I don’t see the Chinese being offended by my Christmas or Easter even though they are atheist and don’t believe in God so why should the Muslim be cater for by removing our history or way of expression not to offend them…if they are indeed offended !
    What about the majority of us that lived that way of life for centuries, why do we have to sacrifice what we believe in for a minority ..we also would be offended seeing our way of life removed to please these minority groups..
    In an election the majority of votes wins , and not the minority !
    God is our history like other Gods are their history so why should I accept their history over mine ?
    Would a Muslim nation accept changes like removing their God symbols from their buildings because it offends a minority of people like me and others ?
    So why do we Christians have to accept any re-engineering of our society to please a few that have been introduced into my country and my way of life ?
    Get these Social Engineers out of our lives and why do they have these decisional powers over the people’s way of life or indeed our elected parliament ?
    I learned at school the meaning of AD and BC and I’m not changing it when I write or speak to please a minority where there is no proof of them being offended. Show me a study which these Social Engineers have carried out where they sampled 1 million+ Muslim per country where the results show that the majorities are offended by my Catholic Christmas my Easter and indeed by AD and BC !
    I want to see the census vote results on paper and not someone on TV telling me that they are offended.

    AD and BC (Anno Domini, or the Year of Our Lord, and Before Christ) has been renamed to CE and BCE (Common Era and Before Common Era) because Globalist’s Social Engineers say it offends non-Christians.

    Our language is being hijacked by the Left to muzzle rational debate

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2041765/BBC-BC-AD-debate-Our-language-hijacked-Left.html

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/reality-check-with-polly-curtis/2011/sep/26/1

  • Botvinnik

    CIA George Bush ain’t dead.