I strongly concur. Both of these men are patriots and symbols of integrity. Their spoken fundamentals - even it the face of libelous attacks - have proven to be proper and true over time. These are Americans in the best sense and deserve recognition from the Trump Administration.
"...shadowy conspiracies of insiders and elites who wished to tear away U.S. sovereignty and make the people of America subservient to a globalist order..."
Bravo! Finally some recognition of the Prophet of the Potomac, Pat Buchanan! I was a state director for Pat on the Reform Party ticket in 2000 and saw the enthusiasm he brought to the rank and file. Had Pat had had the billions that Trump has, he would have been more successful in his bid for the presidency and we may have been saved from millions of lives lost and trillions in wasted spending. When Trump announced in 2016, his platform was pure Buchanan! I was untrusting of Trump at first because of the baggage he carried, but he has come through for us and Buchanan deserves the recognition for paving the way.
I applaud you Roger Stone. This is a tremendous position that I've heard no one else make, but which obviously needs to be made.
Not even My brilliance saw this light shining on the sidelines. Perhaps it shows the strain of battle and how hard we have all been fighting to save our Republic that we have forgotten recent Generals.
No, William F. Buckley Jr. did not grow up speaking Esperanto. He grew up speaking Spanish as his first language, as his family lived in Mexico during his early years. He learned French when he attended school in Paris and only began learning English at age seven when his family moved to London. There is no credible evidence suggesting that Esperanto was part of his upbringing.
Joe Sobran, one of the finest minds at National Review, wrote a few articles somewhat critical of Israel. WFB fired Joe Sobran after waning him that "you can't offend those people!" Buckley was very conscious of where the money for National Review came from.
William F. Buckley Jr. was deeply sensitive to the issue of anti-Semitism, as evidenced by his landmark essay and subsequent book, In Search of Anti-Semitism. In this work, Buckley scrutinized the writings of several figures, including Joseph Sobran, a longtime colleague and friend. While Buckley did not explicitly label Sobran an anti-Semite, he concluded that Sobran’s “tendentious” focus on Israel and related topics could reasonably lead others to perceive him as such.
Buckley’s handling of the matter was nuanced. He dissociated himself from Sobran’s writings on Jews, Judaism, and Israel but acknowledged Sobran’s broader contributions to National Review. This careful approach reflected Buckley’s commitment to combating anti-Semitism while maintaining intellectual fairness.
Given Buckley’s rigorous examination of the issue and his reluctance to make accusations lightly, his concerns about Sobran likely had a legitimate basis, even if they stopped short of outright condemnation.
It is unfortunate that anyone criticizing Israel in any way, is immediately labeled anti-Semitic. When Israel claimed that John Demjanjuk was Ivan the Terrible, Buchanan came to his defense. This was all it took (besides being a traditional Catholic) to label Buchanan an anti-Semite. Buchanan persisted in Demjanjuk's defense and, in the end, it turned out he was right. John Demjanjuk had been falsely accused and the courts overturned his conviction. Regrettably, Buchanan's 'conviction in the press' of anti-Semitism was never overturned.
There is still to this day no conclusion to the conviction in Germany. John Demjanjuk died before his appeal for his conviction was overturned so he remained innocent under German law. It’s not just Buchanan’s defense of him, but some of his rhetoric about details of the death camps and gas chambers that drew accusations of antisemitism and Holocaust revisionism .
Ron Paul is sooo over rated, that Pat Buchana is insulted with Ron Paul being in the same room…and Ron Paul admits he can’t talk his way out of a paper bag, much less argue or find his way, out of a paper bag😎
I strongly concur. Both of these men are patriots and symbols of integrity. Their spoken fundamentals - even it the face of libelous attacks - have proven to be proper and true over time. These are Americans in the best sense and deserve recognition from the Trump Administration.
Add Roger Stone too. He is also very worthy.
Good point! Another Patriot of long standing. In addition to speaking the truth against unworthy opponents, Roger has "paid his dues" for it.
Yes! I enjoyed all of his books, especially enjoyed him verbally destroying that weasel, John Dean.
Well said!
"...shadowy conspiracies of insiders and elites who wished to tear away U.S. sovereignty and make the people of America subservient to a globalist order..."
He got that right.
Bravo! Finally some recognition of the Prophet of the Potomac, Pat Buchanan! I was a state director for Pat on the Reform Party ticket in 2000 and saw the enthusiasm he brought to the rank and file. Had Pat had had the billions that Trump has, he would have been more successful in his bid for the presidency and we may have been saved from millions of lives lost and trillions in wasted spending. When Trump announced in 2016, his platform was pure Buchanan! I was untrusting of Trump at first because of the baggage he carried, but he has come through for us and Buchanan deserves the recognition for paving the way.
I applaud you Roger Stone. This is a tremendous position that I've heard no one else make, but which obviously needs to be made.
Not even My brilliance saw this light shining on the sidelines. Perhaps it shows the strain of battle and how hard we have all been fighting to save our Republic that we have forgotten recent Generals.
Especially as opposed to the traitors that Biden awarded most recently. Despicable!
I voted for Buchanan in 1992. Everyone thought i was crazy . But they were the real crazy ones.
Absolutely 100% Excellent Americans
I agree completely with your points about these two great men!
William F Buckley Jr wrote a compelling book titled In Search of Antisemitism. His conclusion was that Pat Buchanan is indeed an antisemite.
William F. Buckley was installed by the CIA. Not an honest man.
Buckley was raised speaking Esperanto for 10 years before he learned English. There were times that not even he knew what he meant.
No, William F. Buckley Jr. did not grow up speaking Esperanto. He grew up speaking Spanish as his first language, as his family lived in Mexico during his early years. He learned French when he attended school in Paris and only began learning English at age seven when his family moved to London. There is no credible evidence suggesting that Esperanto was part of his upbringing.
You're kind of locked in on literal aren't you?
Absolutely. I live in Reality.
He still doesn't get it. Oh well...
No, if you’re so smart please explain it to me.
The guy was a turd!
Buckley's role was to muddy the water and conceal truth.
Joe Sobran, one of the finest minds at National Review, wrote a few articles somewhat critical of Israel. WFB fired Joe Sobran after waning him that "you can't offend those people!" Buckley was very conscious of where the money for National Review came from.
William F. Buckley Jr. was deeply sensitive to the issue of anti-Semitism, as evidenced by his landmark essay and subsequent book, In Search of Anti-Semitism. In this work, Buckley scrutinized the writings of several figures, including Joseph Sobran, a longtime colleague and friend. While Buckley did not explicitly label Sobran an anti-Semite, he concluded that Sobran’s “tendentious” focus on Israel and related topics could reasonably lead others to perceive him as such.
Buckley’s handling of the matter was nuanced. He dissociated himself from Sobran’s writings on Jews, Judaism, and Israel but acknowledged Sobran’s broader contributions to National Review. This careful approach reflected Buckley’s commitment to combating anti-Semitism while maintaining intellectual fairness.
Given Buckley’s rigorous examination of the issue and his reluctance to make accusations lightly, his concerns about Sobran likely had a legitimate basis, even if they stopped short of outright condemnation.
It is unfortunate that anyone criticizing Israel in any way, is immediately labeled anti-Semitic. When Israel claimed that John Demjanjuk was Ivan the Terrible, Buchanan came to his defense. This was all it took (besides being a traditional Catholic) to label Buchanan an anti-Semite. Buchanan persisted in Demjanjuk's defense and, in the end, it turned out he was right. John Demjanjuk had been falsely accused and the courts overturned his conviction. Regrettably, Buchanan's 'conviction in the press' of anti-Semitism was never overturned.
There is still to this day no conclusion to the conviction in Germany. John Demjanjuk died before his appeal for his conviction was overturned so he remained innocent under German law. It’s not just Buchanan’s defense of him, but some of his rhetoric about details of the death camps and gas chambers that drew accusations of antisemitism and Holocaust revisionism .
Add Mark Lane, Penn Jones, Weisman, and Jim Garrison as well.
Agreed!
How about Joe McCarthy and Trump on Mt. Rushmore?
Ron Paul is sooo over rated, that Pat Buchana is insulted with Ron Paul being in the same room…and Ron Paul admits he can’t talk his way out of a paper bag, much less argue or find his way, out of a paper bag😎
Bravo