13 Comments

Ranked choice voting is a thinly veiled form of an incumbent protection act- the antithesis of sorely needed term limits for these career political moochers.

Expand full comment

These Two , we are calling for a primary to remove them !! We will not forget

Expand full comment

Time to disavow all rinos. Do not treat them as Republicans. Do not accept them. They are a part of the government we just destroyed by voting for our beloved PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP. THEY ARE LEFTOVERS FROM THE FAILED GOVERNMENT OF BIDEN AND OBUMA. WE HAVE THE BEST NOW AND WE WILL KEEP THE BEST. THEY ARE NOT WORTH THE DIRT ON THE BOTTOM OF OUR SHOES.

Expand full comment
2dEdited

Not that they care, but Collins and Murkowski need to be voted out in their next election. There’s no justification for voting no on Pete Hegseth while voting yes for far less qualified Biden nominees.

Expand full comment

Another shining example of why the Democrats'/Establishment's down-ballot cheating this past November in the WI, MI, AZ & NV Senate races was so consequential, despite the GOP still winning a 53 seat majority. (Rogers in MI is also a RINO, but GOP should have a 57 seat majority.)

Expand full comment

they must be guilty of or hiding something is the most logical answer

Expand full comment

We instituted RCV here in the City of Portland for the first time this last election. One look at what we’ve got as our City Council makes clear that anti-capitalist socialism, lo Fascism, is alive and well in U.S. cities and states and that RCV is the perfect instrument for making and keeping it as such.

Expand full comment

One Party Rule “Rank Choice Voting” paid for By George Soros (with your taxes: NGO’s). It’s how they do it in Cali and exported it across the US.

Expand full comment

It’s a scam to confuse voters at polling places. How do the “machines” count the votes is beyond comprehension.

Hopefully the Paper Ballot initiate will eliminate this Con and RINO’s will be sent packing.

Thank you for article!

Expand full comment

They are aging out anyway and should pack it in! Just what republican values do they support?

Expand full comment

I don't think Republicans should go too hard on their members who voted against Hegseth. While I thought the dem's attempts to smear the man were despicable, I also felt that Hegseth was not qualified for the job and that better candidates for the position coud have been found who have a background in managing a huge company the size of the Defense Department.

Expand full comment

Close vote for Hegseth, and it should have been.

He is a questionable selection for Sec of Defense, someone Trump expects to bend to his will.

Harris would have been a disaster, so Trump was the right choice, but...

I don't forget what Trump, Sec of Defense Esper and Sec of Navy Modly did to former Navy Captain Brett Crozier.

Crozier did right, and was keelhauled by the Trump/Esper/Modly regime of "VIP" lives matter the most, and those three felt that the VIPs were not the sailors.

Knowing that Crozier stood tall, insisting no one had to die because US was not at war, yet the Governor of Guam and prominent citizens (who benefit greatly from the US military base and support) didn't want private rooms for the sailors who were sick.

They wanted the sailors all in a gym with the cots near each other and almost completely lacking in the necessities of life. The Trump/Esper/Modly regime fully supported this disgrace.

The report that was approved by CNO Gilday was a red herring, falsely claiming that an extra effort to increase distancing (by less than a couple of feet in many instances) on the aircraft carrier would have made the difference.

That lie was put in the report so as to manipulate public opinion, because most of the general public have never been onboard a Navy ship.

Expand full comment