The Numbers Don’t Lie: Proof Of Fake News Confirmed

Here is the proof. The skinny on fake news.

By Saint John Hunt

Basically, I’m typing this for myself. I can’t imagine anyone with half a brain who is ignorant of the collusion between the main stream (fake) news media and their masters. The purpose of said collusion is to discredit the Trump administration by the non-stop reporting of fabricated “news” aimed at creating doubt in the public’s mind, with regard to their president.

The masters I speak of are in our own government, as well as foreign governments such as Bahrain. Back in 2013, CNN reporter Amber Lyon became a whistle blower against CNN, revealing that she got into journalism to expose wrong doing and found herself more and more under the will of CNN big dogs. They wanted her to bend and even outright fabricate the news.

She was not willing to keep quiet about that any longer.

Being an Emmy award winning CNN journalist, she learned first hand that our own government routinely pays CNN to selectively report on certain events and even make up fake news stories. Ms. Lyon said she was ordered to report fake stories, delete unfriendly stories adverse to the Obama (Hillary) administration, and construct stories in specific manners while working for the supposedly middle of the road news network.

So when Trump calls CNN a “fake news” station, he knows what he’s talking about.

My point is that for almost one year, CNN has spent a majority of their air time on one thing; spreading fake news about Trump “colluding” with the Russians. Not only that, they have reported on charging him with obstruction of justice, of being a racist, of being a woman hater, and countless other lies.

Here is the proof. The skinny on fake news.

Harvard released a study last week that analyzed The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and the main newscasts of CBS,CNN,FOX, and NBC during the first 100 days of Trump’s presidency. The Harvard team found that CBS coverage was 91 percent negative and 9 percent positive. New York Times was 87% negative and 17% positive. Wall Street Journal was 70% neg and 30% pos.

Get this, FOX coverage was 52% neg and 48% pos. (fair and balanced more than anyone else, but still tilted against Trump). And CNN? The Harvard researchers found CNN’s Trump coverage was 93% negative, and 7% positive.

“CNN’s coverage during his first 100 days set a new standard for negativity,” wrote the authors of the Harvard study.

In a 20 hour period there were 13 hours and 27 minutes of “news” coverage, and of that an incredible 92% was devoted to bashing the Trump presidency, with a little more than 3 minutes per hour devoted to all other news. There were 123 guest appearances in one day, with 96 of them being anti Trump and only 7 guests being pro Trump.

CNN’s own on air news analysts did even worse with 69 appearances by anti Trump analysts and only 2 pro Trump analysts.

Now let’s get to the Trump news. Former head of Dept. of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson stated under oath that he found no evidence that the Russians were successful at changing voter tallies or voter totals.   Johnson also stated under oath that he never saw any evidence that Trump or any member of Trump’s campaign colluded, conspired or coordinated with the Russians or anyone else to infiltrate or impact voter infrastructure.

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stated that there was no evidence of political collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

We saw former FBI director James Comey state under oath that he never saw any evidence of Trump collusion with the Russians. He confirmed that at no time was Trump under investigation and he stated that Trump did not request or order him to drop the Russian investigation. He did however reveal that Trump said “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go,” “He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.”

Comey wrote these and other points in a series of memos shortly after his meeting with the President. Admitting that “I hope you can let this go” is not a direct request, he still felt that Trump was subtly asking him to influence the investigation.

President Trump disputes Comey’s account of their conversation.

What is troubling is the fact that sometime after their meeting, Comey leaked the contents of the memo to a friend at Columbia University with instructions he should in turn leak it to the New York Times. This is bizarre behavior for the head of FBI. There comes into question the legality of what Comey did, if not the intent of his actions and the honesty of his testimony.

He’s a slippery fellow.

His actions were to undermine Trump in a stalemate of unprovable accusations. With no evidence as to who said what, it comes down to whom do you believe? The damage to Trump has been calculated and ongoing.

With so much media hype about Trump and the Russians, with CNN raging non-stop fake news smearing the President some folks might tend to believe James Comey.

This brings us to the fact that (inquisitor) Robert Mueller is compelled to resign his position as special counsel due to conflict of interest.

The law governing the special counsel (28 CFR 600.7) specifically prohibits Mueller from serving if he has a “conflict of interest.” Even the appearance of a conflict is not allowed.

The same Code of Federal Regulations defines what constitutes a conflict. That is, “a personal relationship with any person substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution” (28 CFR 45.2).

Comey is that person. He was substantially involved in the conversation with President Trump, who may be the subject of an obstruction investigation. In fact, the former Director is the only other person involved. There were no witnesses beyond himself.

A conflict of interest is a situation in which an individual has competing interests or loyalties. Here, it sets up a clash between the special counsel’s self-interest or bias and his professional or public interest in discharging his responsibilities in a fair, objective and impartial manner.

His close association with the star witness raises the likelihood of prejudice or favoritism, which will stop the fair administration of justice.

Ah well, these are my notes because in 5 years I won’t believe that such a blatant witch hunt could be possible, hundreds of years after the last fire went out in Salem.

It’s a witch-hunt. The mainstream media is leading the inquisition and Trump loyalists must stand up and speak out for our President.

Learn more about RevenueStripe...
  • rust

    It was Donald J Trump who personally ordered Putin to personally order hackers in Lithuania to influence CIA hackers working undercover at the NSA but posing as FBI who instructed Seth Rich to work for Hitlery Clanton at the DNC and convinced Julian Assange to accept the emails that Debbie Blabbermouse Schmidt had copied on to Huma Abedin’s laptop after Andrew Breitbart had telegraphed from the afterlife that James Comey was covering up rapes performed by William “Jefferson” Clinton… aw fergit it, Hitlery’s guilty.

  • Al Benson Jr.

    In actuality we have had “fake news” for quite some time now. It is not just a recent thing. The way much of it is being done now is a little different than in the past but much of what you had in the past was just as fake as what you get today.

    I can remember events I attended in Washington and other places where there were well over 100,000 people in attendance and the “news” media gave us a figure of 8,000. I recall other events I attended where the “news” people wanted to paint us all as flaming racists and so when they came to interview some of us they couched their questions in those terms. They were informed that racists, skinheads, and others of that ilk were not welcome at our events because that was not what we were all about. That made no difference whatever. They would continue to come back and back to the race issue in order to get someone, anyone, to say what they wanted to report and if they could not make that happen then their articles gave no real information and were couched in innuendo to make it appear that we were something other than what we were.

    I have attended events that, when I read about them in the next day’s newspaper, I had to question if that was the event I really attended because the reporter had totally turned the even around and make it sound like something that had never really happened. For over 4 decades I have watched what passes for the “news” media prevaricate, waffle, and outright lie and long ago I came to the conclusion that the media is more about spin than it is news. The media is there only to preserve and promote the agenda of those who pay for it and real news has little, if anything, to do with it. They really are the “prostitute press”–bought and paid for.

  • furtive

    It is the Dreyfus case 2.0. Trump is Dreyfus. Hil-liar-y is Esterhazy, who got no prison time for his Treason.
    Roger Stone us media writer Émile Zolà. ( who was slandered in the courtroom & punished fir his truth telling)

    J’accuse!

    All coming to a theater near you very soon!

  • Sigmund Fraud

    Roger, on November 04, 2016, you wrote article ‘NYPD Chief: If the FBI fails to indict Hillary and her co-conspirators, NYPD will go public with the damning emails’ in which you wrote “a laptop that was discovered has been turned over to the FBI with enough
    evidence “to put Hillary (Clinton) and her crew away for life”.”
    Do you know why Hillary was not charged yet?

  • Brue

    I heard a reference to national security issues having an effect on the release of information regarding pedophile/human trafficking/organ harvesting busts performed by the Administration. Does this have merit and would this also affect the handing down of indictments concerning these cases?

  • Maureen Duffy

    Two words….Operation Mockingbird….
    Look it up!
    While you’re at it, look up exactly why and by whom, the phrase “conspiracy theory/ist” was invented.
    This will all begin to make absolute perfect sense.

    Because the lazy, apathetic, misinformed, is EXACTLY who these schemes were invented for…bait!
    Remove the hook out of your lip!

  • The Mugged Liberal

    Most media, if they want access to power, by definition they must “play ball.” To get a white house press pass, you cannot always be on the attack. Every media person knows this. However, here is an incredible exception. All (99%) the mainstream media hates Trump. In any other administration, they would be barred from the press room. The MSM is viciously anti-Trump. The President could easily start rotating them and ruin their access. With today’s media opportunities, he could drown out MSM by inviting an equal amount of supportive bloggers and online reporters.

  • Gene Hull

    The fake news being published by the MSM is far, far beyond wrong. It is helping “bring down” our nation. Are there laws prohibiting intentional publication of false information that any reasonable person would know will result in harm to innocent people? If not, there should be.
    It would obviously be wrong (and I hope a crime) to report that a deadly mushroom is delicious and safe to eat. The harm caused by knowingly lying about some of our politicians is even more destructive. It needs to stop!

  • albertbryson

    Just forget the news. We are all the better for not watching and reading it.

  • Fake News is not something new. It’s been around for a very long time, if for no other reasons, than lies often sell better than the truth:

    “…Many Americans have an undying faith in the media and thus revere this man-made entity without realizing they are doing so…. People who idolize the media are, at the best, naïve:

    ‘The simple [naïve] believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going.’ (Proverbs 14:15)

    “We are to live “by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of Yahweh” (Deuteronomy 8:3). The word of
    everyone else should be judged by “the mouth of two or three witnesses” (2 Corinthians 13:1).

    “Howard Beal of Network described the media:

    ‘If you want truth, don’t come to us. We will tell you anything but the truth. Go to God.… Go to your gurus, go to yourselves. But, don’t come to us.… Your lives are real, we are an illusion.’36

    “That is what an idol is: an illusion… The impression of an independent press in America is part of the illusion. In 1898, at an annual dinner of the American Press Association, John Swinton, the one-time editor-in-chief of the New York Times, was called upon to toast journalism and America’s free press. He responded in a surprising way:

    ‘There is no such thing in America as an independent press, unless it is in the country towns. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write his honest opinions, and if you did you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid $150.00 a week for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with—others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things—and any of you who would be so foolish as to write his honest opinions would be out on the street looking for another job. The business of the New York journalist is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to revile, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his race and his country for his daily bread. You know this and I know it, and what folly is this to be toasting an “Independent Press.” We are tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping-jacks; they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.’39

    “Mr. Swinton identified modern journalism as a crime:

    ‘Journalism, once a profession, and then a trade, is now a crime.’40….”

    For more, see “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image,” the second in a series of ten free online books on each of the Ten Commandments and their respective statutes and judgments, at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/onlineBooks/second-commandment.html.

  • Roseann

    Yea the foreign interference is Bahrain..hahahahahahahahahhahah! How about you start with who owns and runs the media? Let’s take a look at those names ..shall we! Bronfman,Rothstein aka Redstone, Zuckerman, Roth, Levin, Perelman, Sarnoff and that’s the short list …NO NO ARABS in this tribe!

  • McRandy

    Talking about CNN, even John Stewart, formerly of the Daily Show, trashed CNN back in 2010.